The court permitted the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file the same before the Central Administrative Tribunal. The petition and pending application were dismissed as withdrawn.
Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file before the Central Administrative Tribunal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~54
DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION AND ANR
..... Respondents Through: Ms. Laavanya Kaushik, Advocate for Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel for DTC.
(The proceeding has been conducted through Hybrid Mode)
TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J
FEBRUARY 12, 2024/ nd
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/12/2024 at 15:11:09
ANOJ KUMAR
DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION
ANR
TUSHAR RAO GEDELA
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
