Dismissed
Mahendra Singh Rawat v. M.C.D. & Anr.
Delhi HCW.P.(C)/20264/2005
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Petitioner did not appear despite notice. High Court dismissed the writ petition for non-prosecution.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~R-77
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- W.P.(C) 20264/2005
¶4
MAHENDRA SINGH RAWAT ..... Petitioner
¶5
Through: None
¶6
versus
¶7
M.C.D. & ANR. ..... Respondents
¶8
Through: None.
¶9
CORAM:
¶10
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
¶11
Despite notice, no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner either to take passover or an adjournment when the matter was called.
¶12
It seems that the petitioner does not wish to pursue this matter further. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Mahendra Singh Rawat
- respondent
M.C.D. & Anr.
Coram
AI extract
Chandra Dhari Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court