The petitioner failed to appear despite notice to take passover or adjournment. The Court inferred a lack of desire to prosecute and dismissed the petition for non-prosecution.
The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~R-71
M/S SYSNET GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES ..... Petitioner
Through: None
versus
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents
Through: None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
O R D E R % 05.03.2024
Despite notice, no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner either to take passover or an adjournment when the matter was called.
It seems that the petitioner does not wish to pursue this matter further. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J
MARCH 5, 2024 gs/ryp
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/03/2024 at 11:41:52
M/S SYSNET GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS.
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
