Disposed

Sd Windlesh v. Delhi Transport Corporation & Ors.

Delhi HC23 Jan 2024W.P.(C)/190/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought to restrain cluster buses and heavy vehicles from Yamuna Vihar colony. Court noted prayer on buses was satisfied and disposed of case with liberty to file notice on prayer regarding heavy vehicles.

What did the court decide?

Disposed of the petition and application with liberty to the petitioner to file a representation/legal notice within two weeks regarding prayer B for restriction of heavy motor vehicles.

Sd Windlesh Vs Delhi Transport Corporation & Ors. — Motor Accident Claims | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~2

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

W.P.(C) 190/2024 & CM APPL.867/2024

¶4

SD WINDLESH ..... Petitioner Through: Petitioner-in-person

¶5

versus

¶6

DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Jyotindra Kumar, Advocate for R-1

¶7

Mr. Devender Singh, ASI, Pairvi officer, Traffic

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA

¶9

O R D E R % 23.01.2024

¶10

Present public interest petition has been filed seeking directions to the Respondents to restrain cluster buses from plying through the Yamuna Vihar residential colony (‘colony’) and to restrict entry of all heavy motor vehicles in the colony.

¶11

The petitioner, who had appeared in person in the morning session, had admitted that after the last date of hearing cluster buses have stopped plying through the Yamuna Vihar residential colony. He had however stated that he would like to press prayer ‘B’ in the writ petition, wherein the petitioner has prayed for a direction to the respondents to restrict entry of all heavy motor vehicles in Yamuna Vihar residential colony. This fact has also been confirmed by the learned counsel for the Respondents. In view of this

¶12

This is a digitally signed order.

¶13

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/06/2024 at 15:14:44

¶14

development Petitioner stated that prayer ‘A’ in the petition stands satisfied. 3. At that stage, this Court had pointed out to him that he had not made any prior representation to the respondents with regard to prayer ‘B’.

¶15

The petitioner had sought a pass over to check his records and inform this Court as to whether any representation or notice had been given with regard to prayer ‘B’. 5. However, at the pass over stage, the petitioner is not present. Accordingly, the present writ petition and application are disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a representation/legal notice with the respondents with regard to prayer ‘B’ of the writ petition. In the event, such a representation / legal notice is filed by the petitioner within two weeks, the same is directed to be disposed of by the respondents by way of a reasoned order in accordance with law within eight weeks. The rights and contentions of all the parties are left open.

¶16

ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE

¶17

MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J

¶18

JANUARY 23, 2024 AS

¶19

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/06/2024 at 15:14:44

Sd Windlesh v. Delhi Transport Corporation & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sd Windlesh v. Delhi Transport Corporation & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chandra Shekhar Vs the State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.

Maj B S Maan Vs Union of India and Others

Sunil Kumar Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

All India Institute of Medical Sciences Vs Ms Veeena Gaba

Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors. Vs Subhash Chander Garg & Anr.

Diwan Singh and Ors. Vs Delhi Society for Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Dspca and Anr.

Shreya Suman Vs Punjab and Sind Bank and Others

Sunil Kumar and Ors. Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Ms Shaheed Memorial Society Reg & Anr. Vs Capital Land Builders Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

Sudhir Kumar and Anr. Vs Corporation Bank and Ors.

M/S Capital Land Builder Pvt. Ltd. Vs M/S Shaheed Memorial Society (Reg) & Ors.

Shiva Industries Vs Union of India Ministry of Defence & Ors.

Shri Sudhir Singh Rana & Anr. Vs Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi,through S.O.C & Ors.

Makarand Suresh Mhadlekar Vs Rahul Gandhi and Ors.