A writ petition seeking withdrawal via application under Article 226 and Section 151 CPC was permitted; the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn with rights and contentions reserved to the petitioner.
Leave to withdraw granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn with rights reserved.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~80
THE GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI
AND ANR ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Anupam Srivastava, ASC with Mr. Vasuh Mishra, Advocate for R- 1&2
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA
O R D E R
% 18.01.2024
TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J
JANUARY 18, 2024/ ms
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/06/2024 at 14:48:50
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Manikant Sharma
The Government of NCT of Delhi
Tushar Rao Gedela
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
