Vivek Chaudhary v. Union of India and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Review petition in a writ case; the judge was not holding court, so the matter was merely adjourned to a later date. No substantive decision or relief was granted.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$A1
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- W.P.(C) 1720/2022
VIVEK CHAUDHARY .....Petitioner
Through: Ms. Pallavi Hooda, Mr. Yuvraj Nandal and Mr. Shiv Bhatnagar, Advocates.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Shushil Kumar Pandey, Senior Panel Counsel with Mr. Mr. Hemant Mehla, APP for State Kumar Mishra, Advocate for UOI. Mr. Rajesh Kumar Gautam, Mr. Anant Gautam, Ms. Likivi K Jakhalu, Mr. Dinesh Sharma, Mr. Deepanjyal Choudhary and Mr. Kushagra Nilesh Sahay, Advocates for R2. Mr. Ankur Sood, Advocate for R3, R7 and R8.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH
O R D E R % 28.03.2025
REVIEW PET. 375/2024
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Vivek Chaudhary
- respondent
Union of India and Ors
Coram
Jyoti Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court