Ajay v. Union of India & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner withdrew the writ petition under Section 14 of the Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985, obtaining liberty to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal without prejudice.
What did the court decide?
Direction to withdraw the petition with liberty to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal without prejudice.
What the court decided
$~69
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1670/2024, CM APPL. 6854/2024 & CM APPL. 6855/2024
AJAY ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Rathi, Mr. Manish Malik, Mr. Mohit Rathee, Mr. Vikrant Chillar and Mr. Ghanender Singh, Advocates
versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Rajkumar Yadav, SPC with Mr. Rudra Paliwal, GP for R-1/UOI. Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel with Ms. Aliza Alam and Mr. Mohnish Sehrawat, Advocates for R-3.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA O R D E R % 05.02.2024
(The proceeding has been conducted through Hybrid Mode)
- In view of the bar under Section 14 of the Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985 learned counsel for the petitioner seeks and is permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal for the reliefs prayed for in the present petition without prejudice to his rights and contentions.
- The petition and pending applications is disposed of in above terms with liberty so sought granted.
TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ajay
- respondent
Union of India
Coram
Tushar Rao Gedela
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court