The petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition to file it in the appropriate jurisdictional High Court. The Court granted the liberty to withdraw and dismissed the petition as withdrawn, reserving all rights and contentions.
Liberty granted to withdraw the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~41
Through: Mr. Sunny Choudhary and Mr. Karan Bishnoi, Advocates.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Akash Vajpai, SPC for UOI with Ms. Shweta Shandilya, Advocate and Mr. Gokul Sharma, GP.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA
O R D E R % 02.02.2024
(The proceeding has been conducted through Hybrid Mode)
TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J
FEBRUARY 2, 2024/ nd
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 23:34:07
Ahsan
Union of India
Anr.
Tushar Rao Gedula
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
