This order grants liberty to the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition because the respondent's appeal seeking refund was allowed. No substantive legal issue was decided beyond recording the withdrawal.
Liberty to withdraw the writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~8
CHIRAG UTILITIES LLP ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Gautam Jain, Mr. Shaantanu Jain, Mr. Manish Yadav, Advs.
versus
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-12 & ORS. ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Shubhendu Bhattacharya, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
O R D E R % 06.03.2024
We are informed by Mr. Jain that an appeal preferred by the writ petitioner has come to be allowed in terms of the order dated 28 February 2024. Since the issue of refund would now be taken into consideration by the jurisdictional Assessing Officer while passing an appeal effect order, he prays for liberty to have the instant writ petition withdrawn at this stage.
Ordered accordingly.
YASHWANT VARMA, J.
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J.
MARCH 06, 2024/ neha
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/03/2024 at 11:29:34
Chirag Utilities LLP
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-12 & Ors.
Yashwant Varma
Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
