Writ petition against the Central Information Commission dismissed in default for non-prosecution after repeated non-appearance by the petitioner on multiple listing dates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~29
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
versus
CENTRAL INFORMATION OFFICER, CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION NEW DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: None.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
%
O R D E R 20.11.2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 22:35:44
SANJEEV NARULA, J
NOVEMBER 20, 2024
as
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 22:35:44
Ved Prakash Aggarwal
Central Information Officer, Central Information Commission New Delhi
Sanjeev Narula
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
