Disposed

Ranjiv Kapoor & Anr. v. State Gnct of Delhi & Anr.

Delhi HC8 Jan 2024W.P.(C)/15859/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In WP(C) 15859/2023, the Court held that officers certifying a Sponsorship Certificate based on documents supplied by petitioners, as opposed to personal knowledge, satisfies the petitioners' prayers. The writ petition was disposed of along with pending applications.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was disposed of. Liberty was granted to the Petitioners to approach this Court again in case need arises in future.

Ranjiv Kapoor & Anr. Vs State Gnct of Delhi & Anr. — Service and Employment | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~54

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 15859/2023 RANJIV KAPOOR & ANR. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Rajiv Bajaj, Advocate.

¶4

versus STATE GNCT OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi, Stnading Counsel for GNCTD with Mr. Pradymn Rao, Mr. Arun Panwar, Mr. Utkarsh Singh, Ms. Prashansa Sharma, Mr. Rishabh Srivastava, Ms. Nikita Vir and Mr. Kartik Sharma, Advocates. Dr. Mukesh Kumar, SDM and Mr. Rohit Chaturvedi, CA, District South. Insp. Surendera Kumar Rana, SHO and SI Aman Kumar, PS. Neb Sarai.

¶5

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD

¶6

O R D E R % 08.01.2024

¶7

The Petitioners have approached this Court for a direction to the Respondents for verification and attestation of the Sponsorship Certificate. 2. It is stated by the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the GNCTD that in the Sponsorship Certificate, the Officer is directed to certify that the Petitioners are personally known to him. He states that the officer is finding it difficult to give a certification that the Petitioners are personally known to him. He states that attestation can only be done stating that the certification

¶8

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/05/2024 at 14:32:44

¶9

has been done on the basis of the documents supplied by the Petitioners because the Officers do not know the Petitioners personally.

¶10

This Court is of the opinion that this would satisfy the prayers sought for by the Petitioners at this juncture.

¶11

In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of, along with pending application(s), if any.

¶12

Liberty is granted to the Petitioners to approach this Court again in case need so arises in future.

¶13

SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J

¶14

JANUARY 8, 2024 S. Zakir

¶15

This is a digitally signed order.

¶16

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/05/2024 at 14:32:44

Ranjiv Kapoor & Anr. v. State Gnct of Delhi & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ranjiv Kapoor & Anr. v. State Gnct of Delhi & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Arun Garg Vs Income Tax Officer Ward 35 1 Delhi

Abc Rj Land 01 Pvt. Ltd. Vs Central Electricity Regulatory Commission & Ors.

Vivek Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Om Narayan Singh Vs Union of India and Ors.

Brig Ranjit Kumar Vs Union of India & Ors.

Shri Ranjeet Vs Delhi Jal Board

Prakash Chand Sharma Vs Union of India & Ors.

Parivartan Residention Welfare Association Vs M.C.D and Ors.

Rahul Dilip Shah Vs Union of India and Anr.

Senoara Begum and Ors. Vs Union of India and Anr.

Mahua Moitra Vs Directorate of Estate & Anr.

Pawan Gupta Vs Union of India & Ors.

M/S.Aakanksha Enterprises Vs Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board

Sarwan Singh Bharaj Vs Union of India