Court held the Writ Petition disposed as infructuous due to grant of exit permits and the petitioner leaving the country.
Petition disposed as infructuous; pending applications disposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~16
SENOARA BEGUM AND ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Sanbha Rumnong, Ms. Lija Merin John, Mr. Sumit Kumar, Mr. Jaiwant Patankar and Ms. Ankita Wilson, Advocates.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC with Mr.Waize Ali Noor, Ms. Vidhi Jain and Ms. Shreya V. Mehra, Advocates for UOI.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
It is stated by the learned Counsel for the Petitioner that the Petitioner
has been granted exit permits and the Petitioner has left the country.
In view of the above, nothing lefts in the present Writ Petition and the same is disposed of as having become infructuous. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J
JANUARY 4, 2024 Rahul
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/05/2024 at 15:50:34
SENOARA BEGUM AND ORS.
UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
