Single judge order allowing the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal as permitted by Section 14 of the Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985.
Leave granted to withdraw the petition with liberty to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~59
NAVEEN KAUSHIK ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Mamta Rani, Advocate
versus
NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Rashmi Chopra, Standing Counsel with Mr. Neeraj Kumar, ASC
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA
(The proceeding has been conducted through Hybrid Mode)
TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J
FEBRUARY 1, 2024/ms
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 00:32:30
1 issue framed by the court
Whether leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal is permissible despite the bar under Section 14.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Naveen Kaushik
New Delhi Municipal Council
Tushar Rao Gedela
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
