20. At this juncture, it is also needs to be discussed that on perusal of the record, it is revealed that vide order dt. 25.03.2015, Ld_AR for the management had made a submission before my Ld. Predecessor that management is under the process of shifting its unit from Delhi to Manesar, Haryana and also that the management is ready to take back the claimant on duty at Manesar unit at Haryana and further submitted that the management would pay minimum wages to the claimant from time to time and the management would .also provide him transportation expenses whereupon the claimant expressed his willingness to join the management at Manesar Unit at Haryana, however, the claimant also stated that the management was still running its business from Okhla, New Delhi and the aforesaid was only a harassment tactic of management and thereafter, my Ld. Predecessor directed the Labour Inspector to file status report to the effect whether the management was running its business from Okhla, New Delhi or not and from the ordersheet dt. 06.06.2015, it is revealed that my Ld. Predecessor observed that the management was not running its business from Okhla, Phase-ll, New Delhi. It is also needs to be discussed that thereafter, from ordershseet dt. 30.07.2015, it is revealed that as per 1 the management, the claimant did not report to his duties at Manesar Unit on 08.06.2015, whereas, the claimant stated that he went to report to his duty at Manesar but the management refused to reinstate him. It may be mentioned even at the cost of repetition that during his cross-examination, the claimant
