Dismissed
Sonika v. State NCT of Delhi
Delhi HCW.P.(C)/15537/2023
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tushar Rao Gedela dismissed the present petition as withdrawn by the petitioner seeking an alternative remedy under Section 17 of the Maternity Benefits Act, 1961.
What did the court decide?
dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach the Appropriate Authority under Section 17 of the Maternity Benefits Act, 1961.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~63
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- W.P.(C) 15537/2023 & CM APPL. 62231/2023 SONIKA ..... Petitioner
¶4
Through: Mr. Ram Bhadauria, Advocate
¶5
versus
¶6
STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Raghvendra Shukla, ASPC CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA
¶7
O R D E R
¶8
% 01.02.2024 (The proceeding has been conducted through Hybrid Mode)
¶9
- After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition to seek appropriate remedy in accordance with Section 17 of the Maternity Benefits Act, 1961.
¶10
- In view of the aforesaid submissions, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach the Appropriate Authority under Section 17 of the Maternity and Benefits Act, 1961. All the rights and contentions raised in the present petition shall be available to the petitioner to raise before the Appropriate Authority under Section 17 of the Act.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
SONIKA
- respondent
STATE NCT OF DELHI
Coram
AI extract
TUSHAR RAO GEDELA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court