Writ petition withdrawn by the petitioner's counsel; the Delhi High Court dismissed it as withdrawn without deciding any substantive issue.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~26.
MS TIBREWAL CHAND AND CO ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Siddhanth Nath, Advocate.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ANR ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Vikram Jetly, CGSC with Ms. Shreya Jetly, Advocate. Mr. Ranjan Mozumdar, Advocate with Mr. Manoj Kumar Kulshresth, Sr. G.M. and HOD, Legal NICSI.
CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
O R D E R % 08.01.2024
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J
JANUARY 8, 2024 N.Khanna
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/05/2024 at 16:07:21
MS TIBREWAL CHAND AND CO
UNION OF INDIA
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
