Writ petition against the University of Delhi was withdrawn by the petitioner after arguments, with liberty to pursue appropriate proceedings in accordance with law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~3
VINOD SINGH BARWAL ..... Petitioner
Through: Ms. Saahila Lamba, Advocate
versus
UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kushagra Aman, Advocate for R- 1 Mr. Anshuman Mehrotra with Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Advocates for R-2
CORAM:
HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
O R D E R % 05.01.2024 1. After some arguments, learned counsel for the Petitioner wishes to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file appropriate proceedings in accordance with law.
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J
JANUARY 5, 2024/ msh
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/05/2024 at 15:51:24
Vinod Singh Barwal
University of Delhi
Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
