Dismissed
D.Bhattacharya v. UOI & Ors.
Delhi HCW.P.(C)/14763/2006
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Petitioner's PIL regarding seniority fixation was dismissed as he expired and legal heirs were not keen to pursue the matter.
What did the court decide?
The petition was dismissed in default and for non-prosecution.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~9
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- W.P.(C) 14763/2006
¶4
D.BHATTACHARYA ..... Petitioner
¶5
Through: None. versus UOI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Ruchir Mishra and Ms. Reba Jena Mishra, Advocates for UOI. Mr. Satish Aggarwala, Standing Counsel for R-3 to 34 ( through video conferencing).
¶6
CORAM:
¶7
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI
¶8
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR
¶9
- O R D E R
¶10
% 05.03.2024
¶11
- None appears for the petitioner. The same has been the position for the last many dates.
¶12
- Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the petitioner has already expired on 27.01.2023.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
D. Bhattacharya
- respondent
Union of India & Ors.
Coram
AI extract
Rekha Palli
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court