Writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 challenged the Central Administrative Tribunal's order allowing the respondent's O.A., which had relied on a prior order upheld in another writ petition dismissed on 29.02.2024. Finding no reason to interfere, this Court dismissed the petition in terms of that order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~51
..... Petitioners
Through: Mr. Vikrant N. Goyal, Mr. Nitin Chandra, Mr. Ahwah Mohapatra and Ms. Anushka Jaiswal, Advs.
versus
SHRI. ANKIT
..... Respondent
Through:
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR O R D E R % 04.03.2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/03/2024 at 11:31:51
REKHA PALLI, J
RAJNISH BHATNAGAR, J
MARCH 4, 2024 acm
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/03/2024 at 11:31:51
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the Tribunal's order allowing the respondent's O.A., which followed an earlier order already upheld by this Court.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Union of India & Ors.
Shri. Ankit
Rekha Palli
Rajnish Bhatnagar
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
