Writ petition challenging a Central Administrative Tribunal direction to review the petitioner's claim for compassionate appointment. Counsel did not press it, seeking withdrawal with liberty. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~45
SHYAM ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Gaurav Sarkar and Mr. Shashank Upadhyay, Advocates.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Vikrant N. Goyal, SPC with Mr. Vedhansh Anand, Govt. Pleader for UOI/R-1 to 4.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR
O R D E R
% 01.02.2024 CM APPL. 5954/2024
W.P.(C) 1440/2024 AND CM APPL. 5953/2024 (STAY)
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 31/07/2024 at 14:14:34
REKHA PALLI, J
RAJNISH BHATNAGAR, J
FEBRUARY 1, 2024 p
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 31/07/2024 at 14:14:34
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition against the Tribunal's direction to review the petitioner's claim for compassionate appointment should be pressed.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Shyam
Union of India & Ors.
Rekha Palli
Rajnish Bhatnagar
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
