Dismissed

Tara Singh Jeena v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Delhi HC8 Oct 2024W.P.(C)/13930/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court dismissed the petitioner's writ petition challenging the termination of his kiosk license due to redevelopment. Relying on a related judgment, the court held there was no merit but granted a one-month grace period to exhaust stock before vacating.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed; granted one-month grace period to continue operating and exhaust stock before vacating the kiosk.

Tara Singh Jeena Vs Government of NCT of Delhi & Anr. — Service and Employment | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~3

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 13930/2024 & CM APPLs. 58289-58290/2024

¶4

TARA SINGH JEENA .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Himanshu Pathak, Mr. Aman Jha, Mr. Rishi and Mr. Amit Singh, Advocates.

¶6

versus

¶7

GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Prashant Manchanda, ASC with Ms. Nancy Shah, Mr. Rohan Pratap Singh, Ms. Dimpy Chillar and Ms. Nimit Bhimjiyani, Advocates for R-1.

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA

¶10

O R D E R % 08.10.2024

¶11

The Petitioner, who is the licensee of Kiosk at Inter State Bus Terminals¹ in Sarai Kale Khan, Delhi has filed this writ petition challenging the termination notice dated 13^th September, 2024. The Impugned notice issued by Respondent No.2, terminates his license on the purported grounds of redevelopment of the ISBT, Sarai Kale Khan. This Court placing reliance on order dated 24^th September, 2024 in W.P.(C) 13372/2024 had granted interim protection to the Petitioners on 3^rd October, 2022 which was directed to continue till today.

¶12

In W.P.(C) 13929/2024 and other connected matters, which arise from a similar factual matrix and involve identical grounds of challenge, this

¶13

1 “ISTBs”

¶14

This is a digitally signed order.

¶15

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 08:38:23

¶16

Court, after careful consideration, has dismissed the petitions for lack of merit through a detailed order passed earlier today. Given the substantial overlap in facts, legal issues, and arguments, the reasoning and conclusions drawn in those cases are equally applicable to the present matter.

¶17

Accordingly, it is directed that order dated 8^th October, 2024, passed in W.P.(C) 13929/2024 and other connected matters, shall apply mutatis mutandis in the present case as well. There is no merit in the petition and the same is dismissed for the grounds and reasons stated in the afore-said judgment. However, in this case as well, it is considered appropriate to grant a one-month grace period to the Petitioner to continue operating his kiosk for exhausting the stock of his goods. The Petitioner shall, immediately on the expiry of the one month from today, vacate the kiosk, failing which, the Respondents shall be free to take appropriate action to secure the possession of the kiosk.

¶18

The Petition along with pending applications stand dismissed in the above terms.

¶19

SANJEEV NARULA, J

¶20

OCTOBER 8, 2024 as

¶21

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 08:38:23

Tara Singh Jeena v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tara Singh Jeena v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sh. Sukhpal Vs Ministry of Home Affairs & Ors.

Pusau Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Smt Vanitaben Bachubhai Nandola B Ed College & Anr. Vs National Council for Teacher Education & Anr.

Shri Jitender Vs University Ofdelhi & Ors.

Robotech India Private Limited Vs Union of India & Ors.

Cms It Services Private Limited Vs Union of India & Ors.

Satish Sharma Vs MCD & Ors.

Mukesh and Ors. Vs Secreatry Labour Govt of India and Anr.

Sh. Sukhpal Vs Ministry of Home Affairs & Ors.

Kanwar Natwar Singh Vs Directorate of Enforcement & Anr.

Ca Vishal Chandra Gupta Vs the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India & Anr.

Vinod Kumar Bali Vs Ashish Bali & Anr.

Sadbhav Engineering Ltd. Vs M/S Metro Infrasys Private Limited & Ors.

Deepa Devi Vs Government of NCT of Delhi through Secretary Cum Commissioner, & Anr.