Writ petition withdrawn by the petitioner; the withdrawal application was allowed and the petition dismissed as withdrawn, with the next date of hearing cancelled.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~56
SADBHAV ENGINEERING LTD. .....Petitioner
Through: Ms. Hetvi Patel, Mr. Pradhuman Gohil and Mr. Rushabh Kapadia, Advocates.
versus
M/S METRO INFRASYS PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS.
.....Respondents
Through: None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
O R D E R % 08.10.2024
CM APPL. 59474/2024 (seeking withdrawal of the main writ petition)
W.P.(C) 11870/2023
SANJEEV NARULA, J
OCTOBER 8, 2024
as
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/10/2024 at 16:40:38
Sadbhav Engineering Ltd.
M/S Metro Infrasys Private Limited
Sanjeev Narula
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
