Petitioner sought withdrawal of a writ petition against the Union of India and others; counsel stated intent to withdraw with liberty to pursue other remedies, and the court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Liberty to petitioner to pursue other remedies under law
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~5
MOHD NAVED .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Anilendra Pandey and Mr. Sandeep, Advocates.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vaibhav Gaggar, SPC with Ms. Shefali Munde and Ms. Malavika Chandramouli, Advocates for R-1. Ms. Mamta Jha, Mr. Rohan Ahuja, Ms. Shruttima Ehersa and Ms. Diya Viswanath, Advocates for R-2 & 3.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA O R D E R % 01.10.2024
SANJEEV NARULA, J
OCTOBER 1, 2024 d.negi
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 02:20:50
Mohd Naved
Union of India & Ors.
Sanjeev Narula
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
