Petitioners alleged MCD was taking precipitative demolition steps while their appeal was pending before the Appellate Tribunal-MCD. The Court directed MCD to hold off for seven days to enable petitioners to seek interim relief from the Tribunal, and disposed of the writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~88
MOHD. HAMMAD & ANR. .....Petitioners
Through: Mr.Sandeep Sharma and Ms.Seema Sharma, Advs.
versus
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents
Through: Mr.Sagar Suri and Mr.Kabir S.Ghosh, Advs for MCD. Mr.Moksh Arora and Mr.Santosh Ramdurg, Advs for R-2.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV O R D E R
% 24.09.2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/09/2024 at 12:55:07
MCD.
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J
SEPTEMBER 24, 2024/MJ
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/09/2024 at 12:55:07
1 issue framed by the court
Whether MCD should be restrained from demolishing the petitioners' property pending consideration of their interim relief application before AT-MCD.
Mohd. Hammad & Anr.
Municipal Corporation of Delhi
Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
