Writ petition raising a grievance the Court held could be agitated before the Special Task Force constituted pursuant to Supreme Court observations in M.C. Mehta v. Union of India; petitioner given liberty to approach the STF.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~105
BACHITTAR SINGH .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Ishan Sanghi, Ms. Poorvashi Kalra, Advs.
versus
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ANR.
.....Respondents Through: Mr. Neeraj Kumar, Adv for DDA. Mr. Ajjay Arora, Mr. Kapil Dutta, Advs for MCD.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
CM APPL 55834/2024 (Exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
The application stands disposed of.
W.P.(C) 13368/2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/09/2024 at 12:54:56
Force which has been constituted pursuant to observations made by the Supreme Court vide order dated 24.04.2018 in W.P. (C) 4677/1985 titled as M.C. Mehta v. Union of India .
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J
SEPTEMBER 23, 2024/KG
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/09/2024 at 12:54:56
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
M.C. Mehta v. Union of IndiaReferred
M.C. Mehta v. Union of India
Bachittar Singh
Municipal Corporation of Delhi
Anr.
Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
