Petitioners sought permission to withdraw their writ petition, noting that two petitioners had expired and some petitioners were pursuing a separate writ petition. The court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~25
ABDUL REHMAN AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Satish Kumar Tripathi, Advocate for P-1
versus D.D.A. AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Ms. Shobhana Takiar, Standing Counsel for R-1 Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, ADC, GNCTD with Mr. Yash Upadhyay Mr. Siddhant Dutt, Advocates for R-3 Ms. Mahima Anand Mr. Parvinder Chauhan, Advocates for R-4
CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN O R D E R
% 11.07.2024 1. Mr. Satish Kumar Tripathi, Advocate for the petitioners stated that the petitioners no. 7 and 8 have already been expired and on instructions from the petitioner no. 1 who is the attorney holder of the remaining petitioners seek permission to withdraw the present petition. The counsel for the petitioners further stated that some of the petitioners have also filed another writ petition bearing W.P.(C) no. 9132/2019 and they are pursuing the said writ petition.
DR. SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN, J
JULY 11, 2024 Sk/ak
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/07/2024 at 12:11:22
Abdul Rehman
D.D.A.
Sudhir Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
