Disposed

Paisalo Digital Limited (Formerly Known as S. E. Investments Limited) v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Delhi HC20 Sept 2024W.P.(C)/13244/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought quashing of a Show Cause Notice by which the Land & Development Officer claimed mortgaged property as vacant Government land. The writ petition was disposed of with directions that it be treated as a reply to the notice, a reasoned order be passed within four weeks, and status quo be maintained.

What did the court decide?

Petition treated as reply to Show Cause Notice; reasoned order ordered within four weeks; interim status quo directed at site.

Paisalo Digital Limited (Formerly Known as S. E… — Property and Title | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~108

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 13244/2024 & CM APPL. 55329/2024

¶4

PAISALO DIGITAL LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS S. E. INVESTMENTS LIMITED) .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Apratim Animesh Thakur & Mr. Lakshya Sachdeva, Advs.

¶6

versus

¶7

GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents

¶8

Through: Mr. Mohit Bhardwaj, Adv. for R1.

¶9

Mr. Rajeev Lochan Mahunta, Adv. for R2.

¶10

Mr. Manish Kumar, SPC for R3.

¶11

Ms. B N Soni, SC with Ms. Ann Joseph, Adv. for R4.

¶12

CORAM:

¶13

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DHARMESH SHARMA

¶14

O R D E R

¶15

% 20.09.2024

¶16

CM APPL. 55330/2024 – EXMP .

¶17

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶18

The application is disposed of.

¶19

W.P.(C) 13244/2024 & CM APPL. 55329/2024

¶20

The petitioner is invoking the writ jurisdiction of this Court for issuance of an appropriate direction for quashing of the Show Cause Notice dated 04.09.2024.

¶21

Learned counsel for respondent No. 1/Govt. of NCT of Delhi, respondent No. 2/DDA, respondent No. 3/the Land & Development Officer, as well as respondent No. 4/MCD are present on advance notice.

¶22

This is a digitally signed order.

¶23

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/09/2024 at 12:54:44

¶24

Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, although it appears that the property in question has been involved in a long litigation between the petitioner and the respondent Nos. 6 to 8 so much so that the appropriate directions have been passed with regard to the same even by the DRT, New Delhi, as well as this Court and eventually, the petitioner is seeking foreclosure of the present property which was mortgaged in their favour. However, by virtue of the Show Cause Notice dated 04.09.2024, the Land & Development Officer is claiming the property admeasuring 1100 square yards as vacant Government property and laying claim over it.

¶25

After some hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner requests that the present writ petition may be treated as a reply to the aforesaid Show Cause Notice and may be decided as per the law. Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection to the same. 7. The present writ petition is disposed of with direction that the present petition be treated as a reply to the aforesaid Show Cause Notice and after affording an adequate opportunity of hearing to the petitioner including submission of documents, if any, as regards their title to the property, an appropriate reasoned order may be passed in accordance with the law within four weeks from today.

¶26

Till then both the parties shall maintain status quo at the site.

¶27

A copy of this order be given dasti under the signature of the Court Master.

¶28

DHARMESH SHARMA, J.

¶29

SEPTEMBER 20, 2024 Ch

¶30

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/09/2024 at 12:54:44

Paisalo Digital Limited (Formerly Known as S. E. Investments Limited) v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Paisalo Digital Limited (Formerly Known as S. E. Investments Limited) v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lalit Kumar & Anr. Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi MCD and Ors.

Sudesh Chhikara Vs Principal District and Sessions Judge (West) Delhi and Another

Vineet Kumar Sharma Vs Northern Railway and Ors.

Iq City Medical College Vs National Medical Commission & Ors.

Dr. Ashoutosh Dev Kaushik Vs Union of India and Ors.

Sh. Akhtar Ali Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Rekha Vs Union of India and Ors.

Solitaire Infrahome Private Limited Vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 15, Delhi & Anr.

Pramod Kumar Jain Vs the Vice Chairman Delhi Development Authority and Anr.

Simer Singh Kharbanda Vs Canara Bank through Its Authorized Officer

Ms Khukhrain Builders & Ors. Vs Indian Bank & Ors.

Smt. Pooja & Ors. Vs Jm Financial Asset Reconstruction Company Limited & Ors.

M/S J.M.D Traders Vs Sh. Manish Mohan Govil

Girdhari Yadav & Anr. Vs Jitender Kumar Yadav & Ors.