Petitioner, allottee of a DDA garage under a registered conveyance deed, sought possession or compensation despite repeated representations. With consent, the writ petition was disposed of by directing the DDA to treat it as a final representation and pass a reasoned order after hearing the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~103
PRAMOD KUMAR JAIN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. K.K. Tyagi and Mr. Yunus Malik, Advs.
versus
THE VICE CHAIRMAN DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Arti Bansal, Mr. Kamal Digpaul, Ms. Suniti Singh, Advs. for DDA
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DHARMESH SHARMA
DHARMESH SHARMA, J. (ORAL)
CM APPL. 53396/2024 – EXMP.
W.P.(C) 12807/2024
Signature Not Verified
Page 1 of 2
Digitally Signed By:PRAMODWP (C) 12807/2024 KUMAR VATS Signing Date:19.09.2024 17:12:02
DHARMESH SHARMA, J.
SEPTEMBER 18, 2024
Sadiq
1 Delhi Development Authority
Signature Not Verified
Page 2 of 2
Digitally Signed By:PRAMODWP (C) 12807/2024 KUMAR VATS Signing Date:19.09.2024 17:12:02
1 issue framed by the court
Whether respondents should be directed to hand over possession of an allotted garage or grant compensation for non-delivery.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Pramod Kumar Jain
The Vice Chairman Delhi Development Authority
Dharmesh Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
