Dismissed

Rajendra Kumar Ravindrapal Mangla v. Union of India & Ors.

Delhi HC9 Oct 2024W.P.(C)/13118/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In two connected writ petitions, the petitioner sought withdrawal with liberty to approach the appropriate jurisdiction, citing a change in cause of action regarding catering stalls outside Delhi. The court dismissed the petitions as withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

The writ petitions were dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to approach the Court of appropriate jurisdiction.

Rajendra Kumar Ravindrapal Mangla Vs Union of India… — Writ and Judicial Review | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~7 & 8

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 13118/2023 & CM APPL. 51852/2023

¶4

RAJENDRA KUMAR RAVINDRAPAL MANGLA .....Petitioner

¶5

versus

¶6

UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents

¶7

W.P.(C) 16713/2023 & CM APPL. 67359/2023 RAJINDER KUMAR RAVINDRAPAL MANGLA .....Petitioner

¶8

versus

¶9

UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents

¶10

Appearance:- Mr. Jitender Mehta, Mr. Lalit Kumar, Mr. Shivam Pahal & Mr. Abhishek Tyagi, Advocates for Petitioners in Item Nos. 7 & 8.

¶11

Mr. Ripudaman Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr. Kushagra Kumar, Mr. Abhinav Bhardwaj & Mr. Pratishtha Chauhan, Advocates for UOI in Item Nos. 7 & 8.

¶12

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN O R D E R % 09.10.2024

¶13

Notice was issued in W.P.(C) 13118/2023 by an order dated

¶14

06.10.2023, and it was recorded as follows:-

¶15

“1. Issue notice. Mr. Kushagra Kumar, learned counsel, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.

¶16

2. I am informed that W.P.(C) 13809/2018, in which the challenge to the very same commercial circular [Clause 11 of Circular No. 20/2017] has been agitated, is pending before this Court.

¶17

3. Mr. Jitender Mehta, learned counsel for the petitioner, states that the said writ petition was filed pursuant to the liberty granted by the Supreme Court vide order dated 30.10.2018 in W.P.(C) 557/2017.

¶18

W.P.(C) 13118/2023 & Connected Matter

¶19

Page 1 of 2

¶20

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 20:20:08

¶21

By the aforesaid order, the Supreme Court granted status quo qua the license of the petitioner therein for a period of two weeks. That order has been continued by virtue of interim order dated 20.12.2018 read with orders dated 08.03.2019 and 15.03.2019 in W.P.(C) 13809/2018.

¶22

4. In view of the above, in the present case also, the parties will maintain status quo with regard to the petitioner’s license until the next date of hearing before this Court.

¶23

5. Counter affidavit may be filed within four weeks. Rejoinder thereto, if any, may be filed within two weeks thereafter. 6. List this writ petition, alongwith W.P.(C) 13809/2018, on 31.01.2024.”

¶24

Similarly, in W.P.(C) 16713/2023, notice was issued by order dated 22.12.2023.

¶25

It is now contended that the challenge in W.P.(C) 13809/2018 is predicated on different grounds.

¶26

Mr. Jitender Mehta, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw these writ petitions with liberty to approach the Court of appropriate jurisdiction, as the petitioners’ cause of action is in respect of catering stalls operated outside Delhi.

¶27

The petitions are dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as aforesaid.

¶28

The petitioners have been protected by the aforesaid order of status quo during the pendency of the petition in this Court. The said order will continue to operate for a period of four weeks from today, and the parties will thereafter be governed by any orders passed in the proposed petitions filed by the petitioners.

¶29

PRATEEK JALAN, J

¶30

OCTOBER 9, 2024 ‘pv’/

¶31

W.P.(C) 13118/2023 & Connected Matter

¶32

Page 2 of 2

¶33

Rajendra Kumar Ravindrapal Mangla v. Union of India & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajendra Kumar Ravindrapal Mangla v. Union of India & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Oxford Girls College of Education Vs National Council for Teacher Education and Anr.

Vasant Vihar Welfare Association (Regd.) Vs South Delhi Municipal Corporation and Another

Union of India Vs Anand Mohan Sharan & Anr.

Ms. Kirti Garg Vs North Delhi Municipal Corporation & Ors.

Jagtar Singh Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Bhagwan Prasad Mishra Vs Dwarka Court Bar Association (Regd.) Executive Committee & Ors.

Mool Chand and Others Vs Union of India and Anr.

Anis Ahmed Vs Government NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Vasant Vihar Welfare Association (Regd.) Vs South Delhi Municipal Corporation and Another

Ms. Kirti Garg Vs North Delhi Municipal Corporation & Ors.

M/S Big Chill Cafe Pvt. Ltd. Vs New Delhi Municipal Council & Anr.

Jamuna Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors.

Ankur Gupta Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors.

Sakshi and Anr. Vs South Delhi Municipal Corporation and Ors.