Petition declared infructuous as the respondent had vacated the premises; petition disposed along with pending application without further elaboration.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~30
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
VASANT VIHAR WELFARE ASSOCIATION (REGD.) .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Aditya Chauhan and Mr. Apurv Tyagi, Advocates.
versus
SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ANOTHER .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sahil Gupta, Advocate for R-2.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN
O R D E R
% 08.10.2024
Mr. Aditya Chauhan, learned counsel for the petitioner, states that the petition has become infructuous, as respondent No. 2 has vacated the premises.
The petition stands disposed of alongwith pending application.
PRATEEK JALAN, J
OCTOBER 8, 2024/ MR/
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 07:29:27
VASANT VIHAR WELFARE ASSOCIATION (REGD.)
SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
PRATEEK JALAN
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
