Petitioner withdrew the writ petition to file a fresh one with appropriate prayers.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty in accordance with law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~8
..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Pallavi Awasthi, Adv. and Ms. Shweta, Adv.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sandeep Tyagi, Sr. PC with Mr. Deepak Tanwar, GP with Mr. S. Tyagi, Adv. for UOI with Sgt. Mritunjay, Air Force
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE O R D E R % 05.01.2024
After some submissions, learned counsel for the petitioner states that she shall withdraw the writ petition to enable the petitioner file a fresh petition with appropriate prayers. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty in accordance with law.
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
SAURABH BANERJEE, J
JANUARY 05, 2024/ aky
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/05/2024 at 16:06:49
ROSHAN LAL DHULL
UNION OF INDIA
V. KAMESWAR RAO
SAURABH BANERJEE
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
