Petitioner challenged rejection as Constable in ITBP due to alleged height non-qualification. Counsel for respondents submitted relook found petitioner met 170 cm requirement. Court disposed of petition based on this submission.
Petition disposed of following correction of height measurement by respondents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~7
..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Ashish Nishchal with Mr. Arun Nishchal and Ms. Rinku Shah, Advs.
versus
UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY & ORS.
..... Respondents Through: Mr. Jivesh Kumar Tiwari, Sr. PC with Ms. Samiksha, Adv. for UOI
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/05/2024 at 16:08:28
CM APPL. 51506/2023
Dismissed as infructuous.
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
SAURABH BANERJEE, J
JANUARY 05, 2024/ aky
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/05/2024 at 16:08:28
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging rejection of candidature as Constable in ITBP should be disposed of after relook corrected the height measurement.
MOHIT KUMAR SHARMA
UNION OF INDIA
V. KAMESWAR RAO
SAURABH BANERJEE
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
