Medical college establishment application was rejected by NMC/MARB and the first appeal failed. The court did not examine merits and disposed of the writ petition by directing the Union of India to decide the petitioner's pending statutory second appeal under the National Medical Commission Act within a fixed deadline.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~61
IDEAL INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCE .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Kumar Shashank, Mr. Nivesh Kumar, Mr. Piyush Tonk, Advocates
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Mukul Singh, CGSC with Ms. Ira Singh, Mr. Utsav Pokhriyal, Advocates for R-1.
Mr. T. Singhdev, Mr. Bhanu Gulati, Mr. Aabhaaj Sukhramani, Advocates for R-2 & 3/NMC
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
O R D E R % 13.09.2024
1 “the Act”
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 02:01:41
SANJEEV NARULA, J
SEPTEMBER 13, 2024/ab
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 02:01:41
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Central Government could be directed to decide the petitioner's pending Section 28(6) second appeal against NMC disapproval expeditiously before the third counselling round.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Ideal Institute of Medical Science
Union of India
National Medical Commission
Sanjeev Narula
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
