The petitioner withdrew its writ petition with liberty to file appropriate proceedings. The petition and applications were disposed of while leaving all contentions open.
Withdrawal of the writ petition allowed with liberty to file appropriate proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~28
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
M/S TIRUPATI ASSOCIATES .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Akshat Shrivastava, Advocate (Through VC).
versus
SR DIVISIONAL COMMERCIAL MANAGER AND ORS.
.....Respondents Through: Mr. Virender Pratap Singh Charak (SPC, UOI) with Ms. Laavanya Kaushik (G.P.) and Ms. Shubhra Parashar, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA
%
O R D E R 13.09.2024
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J
SEPTEMBER 13, 2024/ ssc
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/09/2024 at 11:54:56
M/S TIRUPATI ASSOCIATES
SR DIVISIONAL COMMERCIAL MANAGER AND ORS.
TUSHAR RAO GEDELA
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
