A writ petition concerning a dispute with a highway authority was withdrawn by the petitioner after counsel stated the relief sought already stood redressed; quantum of claim may be pursued before a Commercial Court. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~4
PSL INFRATECH PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. B. Ravikiran Singh and Ms. Divya Singh, Advocates.
versus
NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA & ANR.
.....Respondents
Through: Mr. Amit Gupta, Mr. Kshitij Vaibhav and Ms. Muskan Nagpal, Advocates for R-1.
Mr. Vikram Jetly, CGSC with Ms. Shreya Jetly, Advocate for R-2.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
O R D E R
%
12.08.2024
SANJEEV NARULA, J
AUGUST 12, 2024 /as
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/08/2024 at 11:43:09
PSL Infratech Private Limited
National Highways Authority of India
Sanjeev Narula
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
