The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition upon acceptance of the respondents' statement that appropriate orders were framed for releasing jewellery to the petitioner, with delivery set for a fortnight.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~24
Through: Mr.Vivek Bansal, Adv.
versus
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-25, NEW DELHI & ORS.
..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Sr. SC with Mr.Shivendra Singh and Mr.Bikram Dwivedi, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
O R D E R % 14.02.2024
YASHWANT VARMA, J.
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J. FEBRUARY 14, 2024/MJ
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/12/2024 at 15:09:35
Bala Chhabra
The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-25, New Delhi & Ors.
Yashwant Varma
Purushaindra Kaurav
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
