Petitioner sought to withdraw its writ petition against Railtel Corporation; the Delhi High Court permitted withdrawal and disposed of the petition as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~20
M/S VIDEOLINE SURVEILLANCE SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Amit Kumar Singh, Adv.
versus
M/S RAILTEL CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED
..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Ashok Singh, Adv.
CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
O R D E R
%
21.02.2024
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J
FEBRUARY 21, 2024 N.Khanna
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/02/2024 at 10:56:58
M/S Videoline Surveillance Services Private Limited
M/S Railtel Corporation of India Limited
Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
