Petitioner sought withdrawal of a writ petition after arguments to pursue remedies before the Central Administrative Tribunal under Section 14 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, relying on L. Chandra Kumar. The Delhi High Court permitted withdrawal with liberty.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~102
UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Himanshu Pathak, SPC with Mr. Amit Singh, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH
O R D E R
% 10.09.2024
CM APP No. 52949/2024
W.P.(C) 12708/2024 & CM APP No. 52948/2024
JYOTI SINGH, J
SEPTEMBER 10, 2024/ shivam
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/09/2024 at 12:22:27
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India and OthersRelied on
(1997) 3 SCC 261 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dr Miss Ved Gupta
Union of India through its Secretary
Others
Jyoti Singh
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
