The petitioner requested to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to approach the Administrative Tribunal. The bench disposed of the petition as withdrawn and allowed the pending application.
Petition disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to approach CAT.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~6
Through: Mr. Atul Kumar, Advocate with Petitioner in person.
versus
GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel, GNCTD with Mr. Nitesh Kumar Singh, Ms. Laavanya Kaushik, Ms. Aliza Alam and Mr. Mohnish Sehrawat, Advocates. Mr. Rajeev Kumar, OSD, Zone 6 for DOE.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH
O R D E R
JYOTI SINGH, J
SEPTEMBER 9, 2024/ jg
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/09/2024 at 12:46:08
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India and OthersReferred¶11
L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India and Others, (1997) 3 SCC 261 · Who else cites this
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Sunil Kumar & ors.
Govt of NCT of Delhi & ors.
Jyoti Singh
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
