A writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear when called and had been absent for a long time, indicating no interest in pursuing the case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~26
RAHUL SHOKEEN ..... Petitioner Through: None.
versus
THE DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Mehak Nakra, ASC (Civil), GNCTD with Mr. Abhishek Khari and Ms. Disha Choudhary, Advocates for R-1.
CORAM:
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN
DR. SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN, J
FEBRUARY 20, 2024 sk
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 26/02/2024 at 15:28:16
Rahul Shokeen
The Director of Education, NCT of Delhi
Anr.
Sudhir Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
