Petitioner sought interest on his withdrawn provident fund, alleging his PF account was not transferred between group companies on transfer. Court directed Respondent No. 4 to treat the petition as a representation and decide it by a speaking order within four months after hearing the petitioner. Petition disposed of; no opinion on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~96
PRASHANT KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Adv. [appearance not given] versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Bhagwan Swarup Sharma, CGSC with Mr. Vinay Kumar Shukla, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Siddharth, SC with Mr. Anshul Saxena and Mr. Harshit Manwani, Advs. for R-2 to 5.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
O R D E R % 05.09.2024
“(iii) issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India thereby directing the Respondents to pay interest at applicable rates on year wise basis to the Petitioner on the total with drawn EPF amount of Rs. 26,97,844/ as on 31/3/2015 for the period 01/04/2015 till the date of actual payment;”
2.1 Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner was continuously employed with Respondent No. 6 and in the year 2012, the Petitioner was transferred from Respondent No. 6 entity to Respondent No.
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/09/2024 at 12:17:54
7 where he continued till his superannuation in the year 2021.
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/09/2024 at 12:17:54
TARA VITASTA GANJU, J
SEPTEMBER 5, 2024/r
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/09/2024 at 12:17:54
1 issue framed by the court
Is the petitioner entitled to interest on his withdrawn EPF amount for the period from 01/04/2015 until actual payment?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Prashant Kumar
Union of India
Tara Vitasta Ganju
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
