A writ petition challenging the cancellation of an EWS flat allotment was disposed of as satisfied because the record confirms the petitioner had already received a possession letter, taken possession, and the conveyance deed had been executed by the DDA.
Writ petition disposed of as having been satisfied.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~66
SEEMA ATTRI AND ANR. ..... Petitioners
Through: Mr. Saurabh Mishra, Mr. Shagun Ruhil & Mr. Vaibhav Kumar. M: 9990069992 Email: [email protected]
versus
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sumit Chander & Mr. Gurdeep, Adv. M: 9810024126.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA
O R D E R % 10.01.2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/05/2024 at 13:00:53
concerning the said flat.
MINI PUSHKARNA, J
JANUARY 10, 2024/kr
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/05/2024 at 13:00:53
Seema Attri and Anr.
Delhi Development Authority and Ors.
Mini PushkarNA
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
