enjoyed inservice benefits laid down under University Grants Commission, Career Advancement Scheme (CAS) opted by them w.e.f 01.01.1986. 7. The petitioners have expressed their grievance that they were grossly discriminated from the similarly situated JROs numbering over 200 and along with similarly situated persons were compelled to file several cases which were resolved finally by the Central Administrative Tribunal‟s order dated 29.11.1999. 8. Aggrieved by the said order, the respondents filed a writ petition bearing No. 4544/2000 which was dismissed by this Court vide order dated 18.08.2000. 9. It is further the case of the petitioners, that as no action was taken by the respondents in pursuance of the decision rendered by learned Tribunal dated 29.11.1999, consequently, the petitioners filed a contempt petition CP No. 19/2001 in OA No. 246/1996 and CP No. 24/2001 in OA No. 1948/1995. These contempt petitions were disposed of on 31.07.2001 with directions to the respondents to implement the order dated 29.11.1999 within two months of passing the orders in the contempt petition and called for compliance report. As a result, the respondents circulated a policy decision dated 26.06.1995 regarding grant of consequential benefits of assessments in favour of Scientists whose promotion to S-2 grade was ante dated w.e.f 01.07.1976. The said policy decision marked that the assessment and reassessment of the Scientists wherever applicable would be carried out for the period on date 31.12.1981, 31.12.1982, 31.12.1983, 31.12.1984, 31.12.1985.
