Petitioners seeking annual increment. Court noted Supreme Court ruling entitled respondents to consider benefit. Petition disposed with liberty to seek remedy if final order disagrees.
Petition disposed with liberty to seek remedy if aggrieved by respondent order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~12
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
JEEWAN CHANDRA UPRETI AND ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Rahul Kumar Jain, Adv.
versus
UNION OFINDIA THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF DEFENCE AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Rajnish Kumar Gaind, SPC with AO S.K. Arun.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE
O R D E R % 02.02.2024
“In view of above stated fact and circumstances of this matter most humbly prayed that this Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/08/2024 at 12:46:10
question has been settled by Hon’ble Supreme Court in Director (Admn. and HR) KPTCL and Others v. C.P. Mundinamani and Others, (2023) SCC OnLine SC 401 .
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
SAURABH BANERJEE, J
FEBRUARY 2, 2024 /jg
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/08/2024 at 12:46:10
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners are entitled to an annual increment based on recent Supreme Court precedent.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
C.P. Mundinamani and Others.Explained¶17
Director (Admn. and HR) KPTCL and Others v. C.P. Mundinamani and Others, (2023) SCC OnLine SC 401 · Who else cites this
JEEWAN CHANDRA UPRETI AND ORS
UNION OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF DEFENCE AND ORS
V. KAMESWAR RAO
SAURABH BANERJEE
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
