Petitioner withdrew the writ petition; the court accordingly dismissed the petition and disposed of the ancillary stay application.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; ancillary application under Section 151 CPC disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~17
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
BAIBHAVI SHARMA ..... Petitioner
Through: Ms. Cauveri Birbal and Mr. Rishabh Sharma, Advocates.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Shubhra Parashar with Mr. Virender Pratap Singh Charak, Mr Pushpender Pratap Singh, Yash Hari Dixit, Advocates for R-1,2, 3 & 5/UOI. Mr. T.Singhdev with Mr. Tanishq Srivastava and Mr. Abhijit Chakravarty, Advocates for R-4/ NMC.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL
O R D E R
% 15.01.2024
[Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.
AMIT BANSAL, J.
JANUARY 15, 2024/ at
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/05/2024 at 11:43:16
BAIBHAVI SHARMA
UNION OF INDIA
RAJIV SHAKDHER
AMIT BANSAL
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
