Petitioners sought withdrawal of their writ petition as infructuous. The application was allowed with no objection from the respondents, and the writ petition was disposed of as infructuous, cancelling the listed date.
Writ petition permitted to be withdrawn as infructuous; disposal recorded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~64
(GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rishikesh Kumar, ASC with Ms.Sheenu Priya, Mr. Atik Gill, Mr. Sudhir Kumar Shukla and Mr. Sudhir, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH
O R D E R
CM APPL. 47153/2024
W.P.(C) 10174/2023
JYOTI SINGH, J
AUGUST 16, 2024
B.S. Rohella
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/08/2024 at 13:00:05
Virendra Jain and Anr.
Department of Forest Wildlife (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) and Ors.
Jyoti Singh
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
