Petitioner sought additional compensation under the Prime Minister's National Relief Fund. The Court noted the assistance had already been released following the receipt of authenticated documents and disposed of the petition accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~8
MINAKSHI .....Petitioner
Through: Appearance not given.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Karn Bhardwaj, Mr. Shubham Singh, Mr. Rajat Gaba and Mr. Saurabh Dahiya, Advocates for R-2 to 4. Mr. Amit Tiwari, Mr. Hussain Taqvi, Mr. Ayush Tanwar and Mr. Rahul Bhaskar, Advocates for UOI.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
O R D E R
%
26.09.2024
1 “PMNRF”
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 20:40:24
redressed and the petition is disposed of.
SANJEEV NARULA, J
SEPTEMBER 26, 2024 nk
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 20:40:24
Minakshi
Union of India
Sanjeev Narula
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
