Writ petition seeking one year's re-employment service up to age 62 with salary arrears. Petitioner absent on consecutive dates and the order cancelling re-employment had not been challenged; the court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution and default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~12
SURYA BHAN PANDEY .....Petitioner Through: None.
versus
THE DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, GOVT. OF NCT, DELHI & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Naushad Ahmad Khan, Ms. Supriya Malik and Mr. Habib-Ur-Rehman, Advocates for R1 with Mr. Tanveer Alam, OSD(Lit.), Distt. South-East of Directorate of Education.
CORAM: HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH
O R D E R
% 27.09.2024
W.P.(C) 4528/2016
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/10/2024 at 15:55:31
JYOTI SINGH, J
SEPTEMBER 27, 2024/ jg
W.P.(C) 4528/2016
Page 2 of 2
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/10/2024 at 15:55:31
1 issue framed by the court
Should the writ petition be dismissed given the petitioner's continued non-appearance and the unassailed 2016 order cancelling his re-employment?
Surya Bhan Pandey
The Director of Education, Govt. of NCT, Delhi
Respondent No. 2
Jyoti Singh
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
