Single judge allowed a petition seeking extension of time for concluding arbitration proceedings after respondent counsel accepted notice and no objection.
Time period for conclusion of arbitration proceedings extended by six months from 12th January, 2020.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~O-35
versus
ORDNANCE FACTORY, AMBAJHARI, NAGPUR ..... Respondent
Through: Mr.M.U.Khan, Advocate
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA
O R D E R % 13.01.2020 IA No.310/2020
Allowed subject to just exceptions.
OMP (Misc.) (Comm.) No.9/2020
Issue notice.
Learned counsel for the respondent accepts notice and has no objection to the extension of time for conclusion of arbitration proceedings.
The arbitration proceedings are at the stage of cross-examination of respondent’s witnesses.
The petition is allowed and time period for conclusion of arbitration proceedings is extended by six months from 12th January, 2020.
Copy of this order be given dasti to learned counsel for the parties under the signatures of the Court Master.
J.R. MIDHA, J.
JANUARY 13, 2020/ mamta
1 issue framed by the court
Whether time limit for conclusion of arbitration proceedings should be extended.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Azure Power Uranus Pvt. Ltd.
Ordnance Factory, Ambajhari, Nagpur
J.R. Midha
As recorded by the court registry
A miscellaneous application in an arbitration matter, commonly seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
