The High Court extended the time for completion of arbitral proceedings and passing of the award by three months. The Court dispensed with notice to the respondent due to prior consent obtained by the Tribunal.
Extension of time for completion of proceedings and passing of the award by three months from 16.01.2020.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~A-25
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
PRAKASH CHAND GOYAL (HUF) ..... Petitioner Through Ms. Rishu Agarwal and Ms. Monalisha Harsh, Advocates.
versus
SUNIL WALIA ..... Respondent Through None.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH
JYOTI SINGH, J. (ORAL)
I.A. 459/2020 (Exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
Application is disposed of.
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 16/2020
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 16/2020 Page 1 of 2
time of six months expired on 15.07.2019.
JYOTI SINGH, J
JANUARY 15, 2020 yo/
Page 2 of 2
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 16/2020
2 issues framed by the court
Whether time for completion of arbitral proceedings should be extended under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Whether notice to the respondent is required when the respondent has previously consented to an extension via the Arbitral Tribunal.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Prakash Chand Goyal (HUF)
Sunil Walla
Jyoti Singh
As recorded by the court registry
A miscellaneous application in an arbitration matter, commonly seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
